Ingress vs Load Balancer: Key Differences and Use Cases

Explore the differences between Ingress and Load Balancer in Kubernetes. Learn unique features, use cases, and how to choose the right solution for your needs.
E
EdToks5:15 min read

In Kubernetes, both Ingress and LoadBalancer are ways to expose services to external traffic, but they serve different purposes and operate at different levels in the networking stack. Here’s a detailed comparison between the two:

1. Ingress

Ingress is a Kubernetes resource that manages external access to services within a cluster, typically HTTP and HTTPS traffic. Ingress is more feature-rich and flexible compared to the LoadBalancer service type, as it can handle multiple services and provide advanced routing capabilities.

Key Features of Ingress:

  • HTTP/HTTPS Routing: Ingress can route traffic based on hostnames (e.g., example.com), paths (e.g., /api), or other rules to different services within the cluster.
  • TLS/SSL Termination: Ingress can manage SSL/TLS certificates, handling HTTPS traffic and terminating SSL connections.
  • Load Balancing: Ingress can distribute traffic to multiple backends, providing load balancing capabilities.
  • Virtual Hosts: Ingress supports virtual hosting, meaning you can route traffic for different domains to different services.
  • Custom Rules: You can define custom rules for routing, including path-based routing and redirects.

Ingress Example:

apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
  name: example-ingress
spec:
  rules:
  - host: example.com
    http:
      paths:
      - path: /
        pathType: Prefix
        backend:
          service:
            name: example-service
            port:
              number: 80

How Ingress Works:

  • Ingress Controller: An Ingress resource itself doesn't do anything until you deploy an Ingress Controller, which is responsible for processing Ingress rules and implementing them in the underlying infrastructure. Common Ingress Controllers include NGINX, HAProxy, and Traefik.
  • Internal and External Traffic: Ingress is mainly used for routing external traffic to internal services, but it can also be used internally within the cluster.

Use Case:

  • Complex Routing and Traffic Management: Ingress is ideal for applications that require complex routing, SSL termination, and managing traffic across multiple services and paths.

2. LoadBalancer

LoadBalancer is a type of Kubernetes service that exposes a service to external traffic by provisioning a load balancer through a cloud provider. This service type is primarily available in cloud environments like AWS, GCP, and Azure.

Key Features of LoadBalancer:

  • External IP Address: The cloud provider provisions an external IP address that routes traffic to the service.
  • Simple and Direct: LoadBalancer is straightforward and doesn't require additional configuration. It simply routes external traffic to a single Kubernetes service.
  • Port Forwarding: The load balancer forwards traffic on specific ports to the service's internal ports.

LoadBalancer Example:

apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: my-loadbalancer-service
spec:
  type: LoadBalancer
  selector:
    app: my-app
  ports:
  - protocol: TCP
    port: 80
    targetPort: 8080

How LoadBalancer Works:

  • Cloud Provider Integration: When a LoadBalancer service is created, the cloud provider provisions a load balancer and assigns an external IP address. This load balancer routes traffic from outside the cluster to the service inside the cluster.
  • Single Service Exposure: LoadBalancer exposes only one service at a time, meaning it cannot handle complex routing or multiple services.

Use Case:

  • Simple, External Access: LoadBalancer is perfect for applications that need to be accessed externally with minimal configuration, such as exposing a web server or API endpoint to the internet.

Key Differences Between Ingress and LoadBalancer

Feature/Aspect Ingress LoadBalancer
Purpose Advanced HTTP/HTTPS routing and traffic management. Expose a single service to external traffic.
Cloud Provider Dependency Independent (works with Ingress Controllers). Dependent on cloud provider integration.
Complexity More complex, but highly flexible. Simple and straightforward.
External IP Managed by Ingress Controller (can vary). Cloud provider allocates an external IP.
Routing Can route traffic based on hostnames, paths, etc. Directs traffic to one service only.
TLS/SSL Termination Supported directly in Ingress. Not natively supported (requires manual setup).
Load Balancing Yes, with multiple backends. Yes, but only for one service.
Multiple Services Can route to multiple services. Handles only one service.

Which One Should You Use?

  • Use Ingress:

    • When you need to expose multiple services under a single IP.
    • When you need more control over routing, such as path-based routing, SSL termination, or virtual hosting.
    • When you want to offload complex traffic management to the Ingress Controller.
  • Use LoadBalancer:

    • When you need to quickly expose a single service to the internet with minimal configuration.
    • When you’re operating in a cloud environment that supports automatic provisioning of load balancers.

Conclusion

Both Ingress and LoadBalancer serve important roles in Kubernetes networking. While LoadBalancer is simple and effective for exposing individual services, Ingress provides a more powerful and flexible way to manage and route external traffic to multiple services. The choice between the two depends on your specific requirements and the complexity of your application architecture.

 

Let's keep in touch!

Subscribe to keep up with latest updates. We promise not to spam you.